This blog has been created for use during my advanced studies in Aeronautics, Unmanned Systems, and Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. (Along with some random "fun" topics.)

Saturday, August 20, 2016

UAS - Levels of Autonomy

     UAS integration into the National Airpsace system continues to be a long and daunting road with plenty of twists and turns.  A variety of technologies continue to be researched and developed but with no overall standard due to a multitude of technological alternatives as well as barriers.  The changing landscape saw some light at the end of the tunnel with the recent release of Part 107, which applies to small unmanned aircraft for commercial operation.  The sUAS market has begun to grow and is predicted to generate more than $82 billion for the US economy and create more than 100,000 jobs over the next 10 years.   Due to the lower cost of such platforms, ease of access, vast number of applications, and the new FAA regulations, the commercial sUAS industry  could potentially grow more rapidly than any other area.  However the integration of such platforms in the NAS still leaves a few gaps to be filled such as the challenges of autonomy.

     Levels of Autonomy and factors affecting it can vary based on the UAS platform and environment.  Even most UAS used in the military aren’t fully autonomous.  Defining the threshold at which operator intervention and system automation takes hold is still a challenge.  An effective human-automation interaction level must be defined along with trust and mode awareness.  UAS automation roles and responsibilities are still being defined.  An example of the differences in definitions can be shown below in figure 1.  Three different sources and their associated definitions for levels of autonomy shown below gives some insight into the issue. 

                                  Figure 1 - Levels of Autonomy 

     NextGen is a big proponent for utilizing autonomous methods for safely controlling UAS in the NAS.  However, at what level will automation help with self separation, sense and avoid, lost link, and other pilot/aircraft interaction automated assistance.  Research continues to be ongoing for testing automated systems such as NASA’s Ikhana Predator B to determine the level of autonomy that can help in avoiding other air traffic in the NAS.

     Ironically, per Part 107 and the use of small UAS which is considered less than 55 lbs. autonomy isn’t part of the picture.  Flying must be conducted within line of sight, during daylight hours, at a maximum altitude of 400 feet, operations in B, C, D and E airspace is allowed with ATC permission, but under normal circumstances must be 5 miles from the nearest airport.   In addition, FAA airworthiness certification is not required.  Even though autonomy does not play a direct role in this type of commercial integration, the types of UAS platforms under 55 lbs offer some of the latest technology including high levels of automation based on flight controller types.  Many current off the shelf UAS can take-off, land, and fly pre-programmed flights similar to how the military would carry out a UAS type mission, just at a higher altitude and longer range.  Some UAS even offer autonomy options with the ability to follow an object or person, as well as avoid obstacles based on size, distance, and lighting. 

     As the commercial sUAS industry begins to grow more rapidly types of automation used on such platforms will increase as they already have to help the pilot in command.  Automation technologies used on sUAS have the ability to grow more rapidly due to the vast number of applications they can be used on and consumer level pricing.  Along with R&D from NASA and the DOD, actual sUAS platforms being used per part 107 will also help shape and define the future levels of autonomy integrated within the NAS.  However, regulations governing such automation to insure safe flight may have a hard time keeping up with the fast paced technologies.  

  
  
References

Anderson, J.  (2010).  Challenges in Autonomy.  Retrieved from https://www.k-state.edu/ckus/conference/abstract_titles/AndersonChallenges.pdf

FAA.  (2016). FAA News.  Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/UAS/media/Part_107_Summary.pdf

NASA.  (2013).  NASA – UAS Integration in the NAS.  Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Jason_000/Downloads/NASA_SBIR_amp_STTR_Program_Homepage_-_UAS_Integration_in_the_NAS_-_2013-10-31.pdf


No comments:

Post a Comment